Francisco Comesana vs Raphael Collignon Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Success: Raphael Collignon has slightly outperformed Francisco Comesana in second serve points, capturing 42.95% compared to Comesana's 42.59%. Could this small advantage tilt the game in Collignon's favor?
• Return Game Strength: In return games, Collignon excels with 50.98% of opponent's second serve points won, demonstrating superiority over Comesana's 47.62%. Additionally, Collignon also leads in first serve returns with 26.37% compared to Comesana's 24.29%, suggesting a potential edge in return games.
• Handling Pressure: When it comes to saving breakpoints, Comesana marginally outshines Collignon by saving 53.02% compared to 51.36%. Does this indicate a resilience under pressure for Comesana?
• Winning Record: Over the past year, Collignon boasts a higher overall match win percentage of 68.12% in contrast to Comesana's 54.55%, highlighting a better performance track record.
• Surface Proficiency: Both players excel on clay with a 73% win rate, but Collignon's limited grass court experience (33% win rate) doesn't impact this match since it focuses on clay.
• Competition Level: While Collignon has a remarkable 76.47% win rate at the Challenger/ITF level, Comesana has been more conditioned for the main tour, though with an even win rate of 50%. Could Comesana's exposure to higher-ranked opponents give him an advantage?
• Opponent Quality: Comesana has often faced tougher opponents, with an average ranking of 141.92 versus Collignon's 199.12, suggesting he has been tested at a higher level.
• Deciding Sets: In closely contested matches, Collignon has a slight advantage, winning 65% of deciding sets, whereas Comesana records 62%. This could play a role if the match is lengthy.

Editorial Prediction (October 15, 2025, UTC):

As Raphael Collignon and Francisco Comesana prepare to duel on clay, each player brings unique strengths. Collignon's edge in second serve and return points positions him as a potentially dominant force if his service games and returns are consistent. His superior win percentage over the past year further cements his strength, largely drawn from the ITF and Challenger circuits.

Conversely, Francisco Comesana's experience on the main tour, coupled with his exposure to higher-ranked opponents, may provide him the adaptability needed to manage Collignon's strengths. Comesana also demonstrates a slight advantage in withstanding pressure, saving a higher percentage of breakpoints.

Despite these considerations, Collignon's overall performance metrics, particularly in return games, suggest he might have the necessary edge. Considering recent trends and strengths on clay, Raphael Collignon appears to have a slight advantage and is therefore projected as the likely winner of this encounter.